[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Does anyone know why ...
From: |
Andreas Gruenbacher |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Does anyone know why ... |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:50:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.1 |
On Thursday, 02 March 2006 07:25, Peter Williams wrote:
> ... "quilt files <patch>" produces empty output when <patch> is not
> applied? Was this a deliberate design decision? If so what was the
> logic behind it?
The current version of quilt will tell you that the specified patch is not
applied; it doesn't fail silently.
Quilt won't try to list the files that an unapplied patch touches because this
can't be done very well: GNU patch uses complicated heuristics to decide
which filename it will patch (see Multiple Patches in a File in the diff info
pages). You can use utilities like lsdiff for that purpose, but lsdiff will
also guess wrong for some patches.
Andreas