[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Quilt-dev] Converting the latex documentation?
From: |
Martin Quinson |
Subject: |
Re: [Quilt-dev] Converting the latex documentation? |
Date: |
Sun, 26 Mar 2006 23:02:42 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.9i |
On Sun, Mar 26, 2006 at 08:52:14PM +0200, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Sunday, 26 March 2006 20:27, Martin Quinson wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > quilt is currently used by 70 debian package to handle the delta between
> > the debian version and the upstream one. With time, this number tends to
> > grow.
> >
> > Unfortunately, this good news induce some extra load on my shoulder. Since
> > we are listed in the build-dependency of a lot of packages, we shouldn't
> > list too much other packages ourselves in order to reduce the possibility
> > of circular build-dependencies which are naturally evil.
>
> IMHO quilt has nothing to do in the build dependencies in the first place.
> Why
> doesn't a simple for loop that simply applies the patches in order with GNU
> patch suffice? In case people want to preserve the quilt metadata for easier
> hacking, I would propose to either use the existing patch wrapper in the loop
> (bin/patch-wrapper), or to create a script that performs the equivalent of
> ``quilt push -a''. I have nothing against adding such a script to the quilt
> cvs, so that we'll keep it in sync with metadata changes. This script could
> be packages independently; problem solved.
Indeed.
The solution is to provide such a script. It only needs to be able to apply
all the patches and to remove them in the clean target.
Thanks for the idea,
Mt.
--
Quand on étrangle un Schtroumpf, il devient de quelle couleur ?
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: [Quilt-dev] Converting the latex documentation?, Jean Delvare, 2006/03/26