[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t...
From: |
Jonathan Walther |
Subject: |
Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t... |
Date: |
Fri Nov 16 13:18:01 2001 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.23i |
We discussed doing emacs style keymaps a while ago, but everyones been
too lazy to implement them. But we agreed that the emacs way is the
right way. Then you could bind single keys to commands, or bind whole
sequences of keys.
C-x foo
Jonathan
On Fri, Nov 16, 2001 at 10:47:13AM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> In looking for Eclipse in the ports, I noticed evilwm, which shares
> with rp the desire to let users use the keyboard rather than the rat.
>
> To deal with delay after hitting prefix character, they don't use
> one. Instead, they bind all the commands to C-Alt-<thing> - which
> brings back the bad old days of X10, when the window manager did
> *everything* on C-Alt-<thing>, or some such, and "it took two hands to
> drive the thing". Which was why I used NeWS instead of X10.
pgpAXOdACrV6u.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Mike Meyer, 2001/11/16
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., eichin-ratp, 2001/11/16
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t...,
Jonathan Walther <=
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Shawn Betts, 2001/11/16
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Jonathan Walther, 2001/11/16
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., eichin-ratp, 2001/11/16
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Ben Leslie, 2001/11/20
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Ben Leslie, 2001/11/21
- Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Ryan Yeske, 2001/11/22
Re: [RP] The bad old days, and the delay after hitting C-t..., Ryan Yeske, 2001/11/17