[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Resource forks HFS+
From: |
Ben Escoto |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Resource forks HFS+ |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Jul 2003 13:21:03 -0700 |
>>>>> "DH" == Daniel Hazelbaker <address@hidden>
>>>>> wrote the following on Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:50:01 -0700
DH> Right.. My only real confusion was just from lack of python
DH> knowledge. I am not sure I am understanding the flow control
DH> properly, but I guess verbose 5 will tell me that. :)
rdiff-backup uses iterators and generators a lot. See
http://www.python.org/doc/2.2.3/whatsnew/node5.html
or
http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/l-pycon.html?t=gr,lnxw06=PyIntro
for a quick intro to these.
DH> Chmod/chown/chgrp work "fine" on the foo/rsrc files. Meaning
DH> they work without error. In actuality it changes the permissions
DH> on the true file, though that should not be an issue since the
DH> source permissions on the data file and resource fork would
DH> match too.
Hmm, interesting. How big to resource forks get? Does OS X still use
them, or is there just legacy support?
DH> I doubt it, since getxattr/setxattr/listxattr don't exist on OS
DH> X, atleast they are nowhere to be found in /usr/include/*. Hmm,
DH> for that matter it doesn't exist on my linux system either. I'll
DH> have to do some digging and see if I can find out about that.
EA/ACL support isn't in the stock 2.4.x, although some distributions
like Suse have already added them. Tools, man pages, and kernel
patches are available at http://acl.bestbits.at/.
--
Ben Escoto
pgpAlRgJ2RoyU.pgp
Description: PGP signature