[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Why Tape
From: |
David Kempe |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Why Tape |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:39:51 +1000 |
In that same interview I believe he said that disk is better than tape for
disaster recovery/fast restore backups.
I agree for archiving tapes are better. Most of my clients are SMEs that
don't care about archiving but care alot about disaster recovery.
dave
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ben Escoto" <address@hidden>
Yes, I remember reading an interview linked from Slashdot recently.
The scientist noted that data storage size had grown much quicker than
the bandwidth to access that storage. I think he said something like
"Everyone agrees that soon we will have to start thinking of storage
as a sequential, not random-access, medium".
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Tar replacement - format proposal, John Goerzen, 2003/09/26
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Tar replacement - format proposal, Ben Escoto, 2003/09/26
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Tar replacement - format proposal, John Goerzen, 2003/09/26