[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] logarithmic scheduling
From: |
Alec Berryman |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] logarithmic scheduling |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Dec 2004 20:11:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
begin quotation of Rainer Zocholl on 2004-12-13 01:47:00 +0100:
> >and it's probably worth noting, just for clarity, that the reason that
> >rdiff-backup couldn't have this functionality is because of the nature
> >of incremental backups. since each backup is based on a diff from the
> >most recent one before it, they are like a chain.
>
> Yepp.
>
> >if you break one link (delete any file in the middle)
> >your chain is useless.
>
> Except i could use some kind of "back annotation"/"renumbering"
> that allows to delete steps between (by loosing the
> ability to convert to that versions, of course).
Yes; you could reconstruct the file at two points, take a diff, and
use that to replace all of the diffs between the two points.
No one's stepped up with code yet.
pgpikGKhAy7do.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] logarithmic scheduling, Serge Wroclawski, 2004/12/13
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] logarithmic scheduling, Serge Wroclawski, 2004/12/13