[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup to LinkStation: *slow*
From: |
Felix E. Klee |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup to LinkStation: *slow* |
Date: |
Wed, 31 May 2006 23:17:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Wanderlust/2.14.0 (Africa) SEMI/1.14.6 (Maruoka) FLIM/1.14.7 (Sanjō) APEL/10.6 Emacs/21.4 (i486-slackware-linux-gnu) MULE/5.0 (SAKAKI) |
At Fri, 26 May 2006 00:36:39 +0200,
Felix E. Klee wrote:
> /tmp$ du -sh ls
> 398M ls
> /tmp$ find ls | wc -l
> 12772
> /tmp$ time rdiff-backup ls/ address@hidden::/mnt/hda/share/test
> address@hidden's password:
>
> real 148m4.930s
> user 0m13.059s
> sys 0m3.196s
I've now installed OpenSSH on the LinkStation and done the same test:
~$ time rdiff-backup /tmp/ls address@hidden::/mnt/hda/share/test4
address@hidden's password:
real 14m9.354s
user 0m13.288s
sys 0m3.369s
=> Data rate increased by a factor of about *ten*. This, however, is
probably due to the many small files. I've also benchmarked copying
large files (with ssh and scp), and there speed increased by a factor of
about two.
So, it seems that backing up to the LinkStation with rdiff-backup is
viable after all. Tonight, I plan to back up my laptop. I'm curious to
see how well rdiff-backup performs in day to day use, when only a small
number of files changes.
--
Felix E. Klee
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] rdiff-backup to LinkStation: *slow*,
Felix E. Klee <=