[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior
From: |
Jernej Simončič |
Subject: |
Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior |
Date: |
Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:58:42 +0100 |
On Saturday, March 13, 2010, 23:53:20, Whit Blauvelt wrote:
> That would be curious, since the file wasn't deleted on the original system.
> If you're right then --max-file-size = treat as if the original's been
> deleted. Which seems wrong, since it hasn't been. I think that would qualify
> as a bug?
I'd say this is expected behaviour - the destination saw the file on
previous run, but didn't see it on current run (because the source
likely doesn't inform it about files it skips), so it treats the file
as deleted on source.
--
< Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ >
No child throws up in the bathroom.
-- Laura's Law
- [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Jernej Simončič, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Josh Nisly, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior,
Jernej Simončič <=
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/13
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Maarten Bezemer, 2010/03/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Maarten Bezemer, 2010/03/14
- Re: [rdiff-backup-users] Q. on max-file-size behavior, Whit Blauvelt, 2010/03/14