Re: Survey: compatibility vs speed of rdiff-backup development

[EricZolf]

Hi Yves,

On 11/02/2023 21:43, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> "EricZolf" <ewl+rdiffbackup@lavar.de> wrote:
>
> >   before I start for real with the development of version 2.4, I'd like
> >   to
> >   get your opinion on the exact direction to take:
> >
> >   
> > https://framaforms.org/compatibility-vs-speed-of-rdiff-backup-development-1676028206
>
> Can you explain to those of us who are just normal users what things
> like "Get rid of API 200 but keep API 201" mean, for someone who just
> wants to use the program?

I've updated the description to make it (hopefully) clearer. Basically, 
the only question is if you need (remote) compatibility with 
rdiff-backup v2.0 (API 200) and/or v2.2 (API 201), or if you don't need 
it and prefer to favorize speed of development.

Keep the questions coming,
Eric