Re: LibreJS (was Re: CodeBerg addition)

[Aaron Wolf]

The one thought on LibreJS improvement I was imagining so far:

Some sort of crowdsourced list of recognized free JS, like the way that adblocking lists are put together to block ads. I imagine a whitelist that just knows that Codeberg's JS is free, so it is whitelisted not by individual local users of LibreJS but by a collected list everyone gets by default.

On 2024-01-05 4:08, Yuchen Pei wrote:

> On Thu 2024-01-04 13:49:00 -0800, Aaron Wolf wrote:
>
> > Note that there's also this issue at Gitea:
> > https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/13393
> >       
> > Anyway, I think it is not okay to downgrade Codeberg for not
> > functioning with LibreJS when it is 100% free software anyway.
> > Insisting on this particular tooling needs to not be such a strong
> > requirement.
> >       
> > I think LibreJS needs some improved options for operating and should
> > not be a blocker to Codeberg getting a higher grade.
> >       
> > In practice, if sites that are 100% free software are not being
> > recognized by LibreJS, and the way modern sites are put together makes
> > doing this non-trivial, then the problem is LibreJS's approach, not
> > the site.
> >       
> Suggestions on how to improve librejs to make site administrators life
> easier to comply are welcome :)
>
> > [... 33 lines elided]
> >       
> Best,
> Yuchen
>
> --
> Dr Yuchen Pei | https://ypei.org | Timezone: UTC+11
> PGP Key: 47F9 D050 1E11 8879 9040  4941 2126 7E93 EF86 DFD0
> https://ypei.org/assets/ypei-pubkey.txt
>