savannah-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Savannah-cvs] administration/content/gnu-content/faq Project_...


From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: [Savannah-cvs] administration/content/gnu-content/faq Project_...
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 22:34:50 +0000

CVSROOT:        /cvsroot/administration
Module name:    administration
Branch:         
Changes by:     Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden>        06/02/09 22:34:50

Modified files:
        content/gnu-content/faq: 
                                 Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt 

Log message:
        documentation policy is not clear - we need to work on that

CVSWeb URLs:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewcvs/administration/administration/content/gnu-content/faq/Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt.diff?tr1=1.1&tr2=1.2&r1=text&r2=text

Patches:
Index: 
administration/content/gnu-content/faq/Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt
diff -u 
administration/content/gnu-content/faq/Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt:1.1
 
administration/content/gnu-content/faq/Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt:1.2
--- 
administration/content/gnu-content/faq/Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt:1.1
     Sun Aug  7 21:45:36 2005
+++ 
administration/content/gnu-content/faq/Project_-_How_to_get_it_approved_quickly.txt
 Thu Feb  9 22:34:50 2006
@@ -1,3 +1,6 @@
+<p><em>It seems always better to precise that: this is not the
+official hosting policy, just an help.</em></p>
+
 <p>When you submit a project, it is reviewed by the Savannah hackers,
 to check for compliance with the Savannah hosting policies.</p>
 
@@ -49,9 +52,11 @@
 
 <li><strong>GNU GPL-compatible</strong> license: your license should
 be listed as compatible at
-http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html. Alternatively you can
-use the GNU Free Documentation License for technical
-documentation. You can also use the Affero GPL.</li>
+http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html. You can also use the
+Affero GPL (since it is very likely to compatible with GPLv3). For
+documentation, we are currently clarifying exactly what licenses we
+accept. Of course, we accept our GNU Free Documentation License (and
+compatibles), even if it is not compatible with the GNU GPL.</li>
 
 <li>Consistent licensing:
 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]