RE: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed with thedeveloment on GIT repo?

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:32 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Fwd: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed 
> with thedeveloment on GIT repo?
> 
> I had intended this to go to the list the first time.
> 
> On Sat Sep 26  3:11 , ThomasK address@hidden> sent:
> 
> >as Michael Hennebry asked too in his posting a few days 
> before: how to 
> >proceed with all the changes, which are made now on Onno's 
> GIT repo at 
> >github.com?
> 
> I think the thing to do is to go from CVS to git
> and make Onno's git repo the official repository.
> 

I don't understand the reasonsing for this. The purpose of Savannah, is to 
provide central project management, including a revision control system. I have 
no overwhelming objection to using git, but I would like to understand the 
reasoning why the current CVS repository is unacceptable, or why SVN is 
unacceptable that it requires that we use git.

If the problem is getting patches into the official repository, then let's 
address the root of the problem, and not just jumping ship. If people need 
commit access, then let's see about getting that done. However, I want to make 
sure that whatever goes in the official repository is in line with the general 
direction of the project, and is tested enough.

Personally, I do have a problem making the "official" repository offsite away 
from Savannah. Savannah exists outside out any one persons' personal repository.

Eric Weddington