RE: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed withthedeveloment on GIT repo?

[Weddington, Eric]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> u.org] On Behalf Of address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, September 27, 2009 11:25 PM
> To: address@hidden; Joerg Wunsch
> Subject: Re: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed 
> withthedeveloment on GIT repo?
> 
> Changing from CVS certainly is not required.
> My suggestion was based on the following premises:
> There has been a lot of work done that for some reason
> did not find its way into the Savannah repository.
> Otto's git repository is the Savannah repository + the 
> additional work.
> git and subversion are both better VCSs than CVS.
> For those who are good at them, git is better than CVS and subversion.
> For whatever reason, there has been discussion of changing the VCS.
> 
> Were it just me, subversion might be best.
> CVS has never brought me joy, git is still something I've 
> just read about,
> and subversion is something I use at work.

Sure git >= subversion >= cvs. But CVS is usable as a VCS. It's only when you 
start moving things around that one runs into pain.

 
> Clicking on "request for inclusion" brought up an "unknown 
> signer" message.
> Firefox did not specify the signer.

Ok. And...

 
> Even with commit privileges, I probably wouldn't use them.
> I find it way too easy to make a mess.

I find that a silly argument. You use SVN at work. How is this project any 
different?