Re: [Simulavr-devel] Settings for stackpointer

[Thomas K]

Hi Onno,

then let's go the second way - implement tiny15.  :-) If ADC isn't 
implemented yet, this is also to do later. I haven't really a problem 
with TLS. So, if we can use it in a tiny15 implementation, then it's ok. 
And maybe this is a stepstone to get also the other missed (?) parts. 
(but I'm not sure, I haven't compared tiny11/12/15 and at90s1200 of how 
similar they are)

cu, Thomas


Am 23.02.2016 um 20:33 schrieb Onno Kortmann:
> Hey Thomas,
>
> Am 21.02.2016 um 20:55 schrieb Thomas K:
> > Hi Onno,
> >
> > > I am not sure whether the tiny15 is still in the current code base - is it?
> >
> > Isn't in code base. :-) How complete is your implementation?
> Not complete.  AFAIR the pins/ports and timer worked but the  ADC was missing.
>
> Thinking about this, I think I am ok with removing the TLS if it makes your 
> life easier as it looks
> like you are de-facto maintainer(?).
>
> As long as you would be ok with some commits I might make someday(TM) to 
> implement support for the
> Tiny15L (and maybe 90S1200) :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Onno