|
| From: | Robert J. Hansen |
| Subject: | Re: [Sks-devel] SKS should not accept or replay non-exportable certifications |
| Date: | Fri, 13 Sep 2013 20:33:24 -0400 |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 |
On 9/13/2013 8:22 PM, Christoph Anton Mitterer wrote: > And I guess the intention of the RFC is rather clear (with or without > MUSTs)... implementations should not export such signatures... and SKS > counts IMO as an "implementation". In what bizarro universe is SKS an implementation of RFC4880? It's an implementation of Minsky's efficient synchronization protocol, sure. But not of RFC4880.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |