[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Social-discuss] How do valid reshares and favorites look alike?
From: |
Michael Vogel |
Subject: |
[Social-discuss] How do valid reshares and favorites look alike? |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Mar 2016 22:04:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.6.0 |
Hi!
Currently I'm trying to implement reshares and favorites from Friendica
to GNU Social. I did some reverse engineering to find out the structure.
Then I tried to create something that looks similar. See the two files
that I attached.
I distributed these notes to other servers - but only some of them
accepted them.
One server with 1.2.0-beta4 hadn't accepted the second try - but the
first one. Another server with the same version had accepted both posts
- while a statusnet server with 1.1.1-release hadn't accepted any of the
reshares - and several other servers doesn't seem to be happy with the
reshares as well (while they accept my regular messages)
Same happens with my favorite messages. Some servers accept them - some
others don't (but not all the time).
Do I send some bad data? Which fields are really necessary, which ones
are optional, which ones mustn't be transmitted?
Michael
favorite.xml
Description: Text Data
reshare.xml
Description: Text Data
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- [Social-discuss] How do valid reshares and favorites look alike?,
Michael Vogel <=