[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: watchmalloc (Re: Corrupted messages...)
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: watchmalloc (Re: Corrupted messages...) |
Date: |
Thu, 12 Jun 2003 15:47:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
In the last episode (Jun 12), Chuck Yerkes said:
> Well, murphy lives.
> Been running with watchmalloc for the last few days.
> Nothing amiss. <sigh>.
>
> Load is up (from 0.11 to 4-5 on a 4-way machine).
> No cores yet.
>
> /me wonders if just the act of clearing memory it keeping
> the problem from happening. Random thoughts move towards the
> problem being that some 8 bit data is being written to memory
> that's causing the some false End-Of-Something to be tripped.
Try this: Log the first 20 bytes or so of the 'body' string just
before the call to smfi_replacebody. If those come out garbled, the
problem is definitely in the milter and we can track it back to the
source. If they're okay, then either smfi_replacebody is screwing up
or the body is getting corrupted inside sendmail after that.
You don't happen to have a Purify license? :)
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden
- Re: watchmalloc (Re: Corrupted messages...), (continued)
- Re: watchmalloc (Re: Corrupted messages...), Chuck Yerkes, 2003/06/12
- None, Valentin Chopov, 2003/06/12
- Re: None, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/12
- New options, Valentin Chopov, 2003/06/13
- Re: New options, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/13
- Re: None, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/14
- Re: None, Thomas Cameron, 2003/06/14
- Re: None, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/14
- CVS - Was: Re: None, Valentin Chopov, 2003/06/16
- Re: CVS - Was: Re: None, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/16
- Re: watchmalloc (Re: Corrupted messages...),
Dan Nelson <=