[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What the heck.... Spamass-milt on my work machine
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: What the heck.... Spamass-milt on my work machine |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Jul 2003 12:53:53 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
In the last episode (Jul 09), Derek J. Balling said:
> From my home (working) installation:
>
> $ cat /etc/default/spamass-milter
> OPTIONS="-m -u nobody"
> $ cat /etc/default/spamassassin
> ENABLED=1
> OPTIONS="-c -m 10 -D"
>
> From my work (not working) installation:
>
> $ cat /etc/default/spamass-milter
> OPTIONS="-m -u mail"
> $ cat /etc/default/spamassassin
> ENABLED=1
> OPTIONS="-c -m 10 -D"
>
>
> From my work (not working) log file, when it encounters an alias (e.g.,
> where address@hidden points to address@hidden):
>
> Jul 9 11:32:22 whitechapel spamd[6587]: logmsg: handle_user: unable to find
> user 'whois'!
> Jul 9 11:32:22 whitechapel spamd[6587]: handle_user: unable to find user
> 'whois'!
> Jul 9 11:32:22 whitechapel spamd[6587]: logmsg: Still running as root: user
> not specified with -u, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
> Jul 9 11:32:22 whitechapel spamd[6587]: Still running as root: user not
> specified with -u, not found, or set to root. Fall back to nobody.
> Jul 9 11:32:22 whitechapel spamd[6587]: logmsg: fatal: setuid to nobody
> failed
> Jul 9 11:32:22 whitechapel spamd[6587]: fatal: setuid to nobody failed
Your real problem is spamd's inability to setuid to nobody.
Unfortunately, it doesn't tell you why it failed.
> ... and, according to `ps`, it IS running with -u:
... and spamc was called with "-u whois". Note the error message says
"user not specified with -u, not found, or set to root". You fall in
the 2nd category. Do you have a "nobody" user on that system?
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden