[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Milter gone wiggy? Maybe spamd?
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: Milter gone wiggy? Maybe spamd? |
Date: |
Sun, 25 Jan 2004 21:49:39 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.5.1i |
In the last episode (Jan 25), Dan O'Brien said:
> Environment is Fedora Core 1 (fully up-to-date w/ patches); SendMail
> 8.12.10-1.1.1 (Fedora Core RPM); SpamAssassin 2.63; spamass-milter
> 0.2.0+cvs.
>
> Yesterday, at approximately 5:20pm, my server stopped filtering spam... it
> just decided to happily pass it along to its intended recipient. All the
> processes appeared to be running. /var/log/maillog shows calls to spamd,
> and it responding to connections, just doesn't seem to be doing any
> processing... Nothing on /var/log/messages.
>
> On closer inspection and some further thought, it's probably a problem
> with SPAMD, since the milter seems to be getting some response from
> SpamAssassin... But if anyone can offer any insight, I'd appreciate it.
>
> /* - - - - LAST "GOOD" MESSAGE PROCESSED - - - - */
>
> Jan 24 17:19:07 sweep sendmail[25146]: i0OMJ6Tf025146:
> from=<address@hidden>, size=4291, class=-100, nrcpts=1,
> msgid=<address@hidden>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=hormel.redhat.com
> [66.187.233.30]
> Jan 24 17:19:07 sweep spamd[17700]: connection from localhost.localdomain
> [127.0.0.1] at port 44865
> Jan 24 17:19:07 sweep spamd[25152]: handle_user: unable to find user
> 'list-admin'!
> Jan 24 17:19:07 sweep spamd[25152]: processing message <address@hidden> for
> list-admin:501.
> Jan 24 17:19:11 sweep spamd[25152]: clean message (-4.8/5.0) for
> list-admin:501 in 4.0 seconds, 4527 bytes.
> Jan 24 17:19:11 sweep sendmail[25146]: i0OMJ6Tf025146: Milter add: header:
> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=no
> \n\tversion=2.63
> Jan 24 17:19:11 sweep sendmail[25146]: i0OMJ6Tf025146: Milter add: header:
> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on
> \n\tsweep.axonsolutions.com
> Jan 24 17:19:11 sweep sendmail[25154]: i0OMJ6Tf025146: to=<address@hidden>,
> delay=00:00:04, xdelay=00:00:00, mailer=smtp, pri=214291,
> relay=hub.axonsolutions.com. [192.168.58.11], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Message
> accepted for delivery)
>
> /* - - - - SOMETHING GONE TERRIBLY WRONG - - - - */
>
> Jan 24 17:22:09 sweep sendmail[25155]: i0OMM9Tf025155:
> from=<address@hidden>, size=3435, class=-100, nrcpts=1,
> msgid=<address@hidden>, proto=ESMTP, daemon=MTA, relay=hormel.redhat.com
> [66.187.233.30]
> Jan 24 17:22:10 sweep spamd[17700]: connection from localhost.localdomain
> [127.0.0.1] at port 44868
> Jan 24 17:22:10 sweep spamd[25161]: handle_user: unable to find user
> 'list-admin'!
> Jan 24 17:22:10 sweep spamd[25161]: processing message <address@hidden> for
> list-admin:501.
> Jan 24 17:22:12 sweep sendmail[25163]: i0OMM9Tf025155: to=<address@hidden>,
> delay=00:00:03, xdelay=00:00:02, mailer=smtp, pri=213435,
> relay=hub.axonsolutions.com. [192.168.58.11], dsn=2.0.0, stat=Sent (Message
> accepted for delivery)
Yes, it looks like spamd is failing somehow, and passing the message
through unchanged. You can see that spamass-milter isn't adding the
X-Spam-Status or X-Spam-Checker-Version headers, probably because spamd
never added them. You can probably check this by piping a message
through spamc manually and see what you get.
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden