[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM suppo
From: |
Diogo F. S. Ramos |
Subject: |
Re: [STUMP] What are the Common Lisp implementations which StumpWM supports? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jan 2015 15:22:33 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
> On 15 January 2015 at 01:07, Diogo F. S. Ramos <address@hidden> wrote:
>> I couldn't find a list of the supported Common Lisp implementations. Is
>> there one?
>
> Probably not an accurate one. The README states "sbcl, clisp, ccl and
> ecl". Makefile.in is likely a good list of those that people have
> made it support in the past (although it's worth noting that "getting
> it running" and "building an executable image" aren't exactly the same
> problem - I've had it sort of running under abcl in the past).
Oh, thank you. Shame on me, I missed that README part.
> wrappers.lisp contains a load of junk[0] which I believe was
> originally copied verbatim from elsewhere. It should really be done
> away with and replaced with compatibility libraries from quicklisp.
I hope StumpWM does not start depending on Quicklisp. I run it using
only Debian, even though README lists cl-xembed as a dependency and
Debian does not have it in its repository.
> Of course a major factor is which lisps currently have a working clx.
> I believe the clx that most people use is currently under stewardship
> of the sharplispers; they may have a list of implementations they aim
> to support.
Looking at <https://github.com/sharplispers/clx>, it seems they aim to
support SBCL.