[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Slot allocations
From: |
Noah Lavine |
Subject: |
Re: Slot allocations |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Apr 2011 09:51:17 -0400 |
I recently made two reviews which were aimed at this issue. I took two
projects and tried to argue that they should get slots because they
had unique advantages.
I think the way forward is for many more people to make such reviews.
Then we could have a discussion about the relative merits of each
proposal.
Noah
On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 6:43 AM, Daniel Thomas <address@hidden> wrote:
> So currently there are 16 projects for GNU which are rated with the top
> average score of 5. We have 10 slots. How is that disparity being
> resolved? Are the org admins going to go through those 16 and decide
> which 10 are the best? Is an average score of 5 indicative of that
> project being awesome? Is there anything I should be doing to help?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Daniel
>
- Slot allocations, Daniel Thomas, 2011/04/16
- Re: Slot allocations, Nagarjuna G, 2011/04/16
- Re: Slot allocations,
Noah Lavine <=
- Re: Slot allocations, Per Bothner, 2011/04/16
- Re: Slot allocations, Per Bothner, 2011/04/16
- Re: Slot allocations, Jamison Hope, 2011/04/17
- Re: Slot allocations, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva, 2011/04/18
- Re: Slot allocations, Per Bothner, 2011/04/18
- Re: Slot allocations, Thomas Schwinge, 2011/04/19
- Re: Slot allocations, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva, 2011/04/19
- Re: Slot allocations, Thomas Schwinge, 2011/04/19
- Re: Slot allocations, Rodrigo Rodrigues da Silva, 2011/04/20
- Re: Slot allocations, Paolo Bonzini, 2011/04/20