> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Giuseppe Scrivano <
address@hidden> wrote:
> >
address@hidden (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
>
> >> > This is a bit misleading, especially on this list. Orgs get paid,
> >> > not mentors. Some orgs redistribute this money to the mentors; GNU
> >> > hasn't generally done this.
> >> That is sad :( For all their hard work mentors deserve to be rewarded.
> >> Oh, well, i stand corrected then.
> >> The reward is computer user freedom.
> > absolutely right, but on the other hand there is some money and who
> > deserves it more than who is doing the real job? As this money is
> > supposed to support the development of Free Software/Open Source
> > software, I don't see a better way to use this money than give it, at
> > least partly, to whom is directly involved with it. Differently than
> > sporadic contributions, a mentor has responsibilities with the student
> > and has to find some time for it.
>
> I pretty much agree. Even if no money go to the mentor there should be
> something that counts as thank you gesture.
>
> regards,
> Nikos
>