Re: [IMPORTANT] irc meeting synthesis

[Bastien]

Hello,

thanks for the report.

Giuseppe Scrivano <address@hidden> writes:

> after our meeting on irc, given that we would like to give the same
> opportunities to big and small projects, we came to the following
> conclusions:
>
> - There will be an "amazing" proposal for any project, thus projects can
>   still mark more proposals as "amazing", if it is really the case.
>
> - We want to maximize the number of "desired" proposals.
>
> Please use a score of 5 for the "amazing" proposal(s) and 4 for the
> "desired" proposals, both "amazing" and "desired" proposals must have at
> least one possible mentor assigned.

Do I understand correctly that mentors only rate *their* proposals?

> We have less than two days to define these values, so please score your
> proposals as soon as possible.  If a project has no scored proposals,
> then it gets assigned an "amazing" slot and as many "desired" slots as
> possible (considering how many mentors and proposals there are).

So, the raw output is this: if there is just one proposal for a project
it will be automatically rated as "amazing", even if the mentor (and/or
anybody else) doesn't have/take the time to rate it.

Apprently I'm alone in thinking this is not a good approach, so let 
it be.  But this will just postpone the problem: when Google will say
"Guys, you have 15 desired proposals and 11 amazing proposals, this is
too much, we give you 8 slots", how will we proceed?

Just trying to look a bit forward, thanks,

-- 
 Bastien