[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Catalog of agents
From: |
John A. Lopez |
Subject: |
Re: Catalog of agents |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Apr 1997 09:43:13 -0700 |
glen e. p. ropella wrote:
>
> Sven N. Thommesen writes:
> > Which leads me to a suggestion for 'someone' to do:
> >
> > the essence of Swarm modelling is, of course, the behavioral
> > methods of our agents. I'd like to see a web site collect
> > a catalog of different behavioral methods people have used,
> > described in pseudo-code and/or source code. (Similar to
> > Prof. Eckart's collection of CA models.) This would allow
> > others to test out the posted methods, and to critique them.
> > Over time, we might get an idea of which algorithms are
> > useful and which not for given applications.
> >
> > Any takers ?
>
> This is an excellent idea. Of course, more than just the
> agent methods should be described, I would guess. But,
> it might be reasonable to compress the "essence" of a
> model with descriptive pseudo-code for the agent types
> and their respective methods, and the environment design
> and it's respective methods. The one element left is the
> scheduling.
>
> Developing compact descriptions of these three elements
> might even help us with the Schedule-language specification
> when and if we start working seriously on that. A language
> needs well-specified data types (agents and environments)
> as well as well-specified operator types.
>
> As far as takers for the task.... Brad?
>
> glen
Sven and Glen,
I think this is more than an excellent idea, since this list would
necessarily evolve to discipline-specific lists. Such posted methods
could be improved upon or varied in ways which could form the basis of a
dialog (parallelog?) within a research discipline (mine is
anthropology/archaeology). I'd be more than happy to post my kinship,
mimicry, and the other behavioral methods I've developed or am working
on.
In light of the recent discussion regarding future funding and
non-profit organization structure, we could take a lesson from Swarm.
This idea of a methods listing could be a source for SFI income: users
could pay some individual or institutional fee for specific downloads of
methods (available free to contributers within a class of course).
Perhaps the SFI folks could continue to make its server available and
act as a GA and cull those discussions which have little or no
interest.
John
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================