[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Simulating Individual Behavior
From: |
Ginger Booth |
Subject: |
Re: Simulating Individual Behavior |
Date: |
Thu, 17 Apr 97 11:44:57 EDT |
Paul and Phillippe and Mike and Chris,
I've been enjoying this thread a great deal. From my ecology model,
I have been somewhat frustrated by the lack of the kind of data I wanted,
but in practice, taking the tiniest bit of relevant detail, instead
of all possible detail, buys a lot.... You really get to see what the
ramifications are of that seemingly little detail. And there are a lot of
those little details "we all know", but haven't necessarily realized how
important they are.
As a trivial example, when deciding a herbivore's freedom of movement
per round, I found that ~215 degrees (similar to a vision path) worked really
well, and the "obvious" 360 degrees (random direction) was devastating to the
plants. Gecko tells me these crazy things a lot, and I'm forced to think it
through and hunt data.
Another one I just ran into (predictably, while trying to do something
else that Gecko balked at ;), was that my crazy program told me that terrestrial
producers should be more productive than aquatic. "Dim-witted bug-generator!"
I muttered.... However, to settle the argument, I got the data. Though I'd
always "known" that oceanic plankton were "of course" the dominant producers on
earth, turns out I was wrong. The "dim-witted bug-generator" was right. If
it's right for the right reasons (always a danger, being right for the wrong
reason ;), I accidentally found something out that really matters to ecological
policy! For it suggests what kind of terrestrial ecosystems (rather safer
and easier to manipulate than open ocean :) could conceivably offset CO2
emissions. Assuming I could prove it, of course....
In other words (Chris's :):
> So - again, I don't think of this as a problem, but a feature
> of these models......and I don't think of it as unique to
> ABM models, per se - I think new tools often offer us new
> "opportunities" to collect data...
Ditto.
Cheers,
Ginger
==================================
Swarm-Modelling is for discussion of Simulation and Modelling techniques
esp. using Swarm. For list administration needs (esp. [un]subscribing),
please send a message to <address@hidden> with "help" in the
body of the message.
==================================
- Re: Simulating Individual Behavior, (continued)
Re: Simulating Individual B, Randall Gray, 1997/04/17
Re: Simulating Individual B, cgl, 1997/04/17
- Re: Simulating Individual Behavior,
Ginger Booth <=
Re: Simulating Individual B, Kevin Crowston, 1997/04/17
Re: Simulating Individual B, cgl, 1997/04/17
Re: Simulating Individual B, J.J. Merelo Guervos, 1997/04/17