[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes
From: |
Rob |
Subject: |
Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes |
Date: |
Thu, 26 Sep 2013 22:22:30 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 09:23:58PM -0500, Jared Maddox wrote:
> > Yes, as you got below I meant removing functions such as
> >
> > if (0)
> > some_function();
> >
> > The "problem" is that many applications use this construct instead of
> > adding #ifdefs everywhere.
>
> So I've heard. Just use #if already, people! It exists for a reason, after
> all.
One reason people don't use #if is that you have to recompile for every
permutation of the expression inside the #if. Otherwise code can go
stale if left out of the edit-make-commit loop.
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, (continued)
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/22
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/23
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/25
- Re: [Tinycc-devel] inline assembly and optimization passes, Jared Maddox, 2013/09/27