Re: [Tinycc-devel] Building Tor with tcc dynamically [was: error: Unknown relocation type for got: 23 with -static]

[Michael Matz]

Hello John,

On Wed, 3 Jun 2020, John Scott wrote:

> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020 11:16:03 AM EDT Michael Matz wrote:
> > > Why is it not recommended? Because it is not well supported or just
> > > because
> > > shared lib, by ideology, is generally preferred?
> > I think the comment is indeed about the general recommendation to not link
> > statically.
> I recall now seeing a TODO file in Git that said static linking still 
> needed to be implemented. That's clearly not the case anymore, but gave 
> me the impression it was still experimental.
> Except for a small change I had to make, dynamic Tor almost built fine. 
> I had to make this change to Tor [1] related to inconsistently mixing 
> enums and ints in declarations. As a C novice I was planning on sending 
> this upstream, but I think tcc's TODO said this might be a quirk to be 
> fixed. I'd appreciate knowing where the issue lies if someone more 
> knowledgeable would look at it.
While the change for Tor seems a good idea irrespective of the error 
message from TCC (purely from a code cosmetic perspective) it is correct 
ISO C in usual implementations (when an enum containing a negative member 
is compatible with 'int').  IOW TCC gave the error message incorrectly.
A related error message when the respective function would have been 
redeclared with type 'unsigned' (but same enum at the other decl) is 
correct, though.
All fixed in latest mob.  Many thanks for the report!


Ciao,
Michael.