Re: [Tlf-devel] Hamlib slows XTLF Wayyyyyy Doooowwwwwwnnnnnnn

[Nate Bargmann]

* Rein Couperus PA0R <address@hidden> [2006 Jul 08 03:26 -0500]:
> I can't imagine ;) I will look into that. It should not have that
> effect, it just runs rigctl every 10 seconds or so. Problably something
> else hogging the CPU. 

I noticed through the ps ax command that rigctl and a shell script were
running.  Is there a reason the hamlib perl bindings aren't useful? 
I'm sure Stephane would be interested.  I'd think that for simple TRX
control that the Perl bindings should be useful.

My CPU load normally runs 0.00 to 0.05 at idle with 91 processes
running at the moment.  With xtlf running it was around 0.22 or so 
and didn't increase when TRX control was enabled, but the xtlf gui 
becomes very slow to respond as does the response sending to cwdeamon.  
One cwdaemon began sending, I didn't notice any problems so I think 
cwdaemon can be excused as a source of the trouble.

> Oh well, it keeps me busy so I don't get funny idaes :)

We gotta keep you focused!  :-D

> Does the effect go away when you stop TRX control?

Yes.

73, de Nate >>

-- 
 Wireless | Amateur Radio Station N0NB          |  Successfully Microsoft
  Amateur radio exams; ham radio; Linux info @  | free since January 1998.
             http://www.qsl.net/n0nb/           |  "Debian, the choice of
             My Kawasaki KZ-650 SR @            |     a GNU generation!"
        http://www.networksplus.net/n0nb/       |   http://www.debian.org