Re: [Uisp-dev] A second patch

[Theodore A. Roth]

On Thu, 30 Sep 2004, Margarita Manterola wrote:

> Hi!
>
> There was something weird in the patch I sent a couple of days ago,
> and it was the need of a non-inverted reset, when AT89XXX micro
> controllers _do_ have a reset that is the inverted AVR's reset.
>
> After talking this over with Wojtek Kaniewski and investigating a bit
> more, I found a page that explained what was happening:
> http://www.beyondlogic.org/spp/parallel.htm#2
>
> The cable I'm using is the ATDH, which resets through pin 17, which is
> hardware inverted.  Seeing this, I made a few changes to the patch,
> dropping my -d89S52 parameter, and adding the inverted reset directly
> to the cable configuration.
> I also added a couple of comments about the pins that are low active.
>
> Also, I changed the way in which the -dinvert parameter works.
> Instead of setting the values directly to 1, it switches the value the
> parameter has to its contrary.
>
> This patch is a little bit more intrusive than the other one, but I
> think it's quite better. As the previous one, it's done taking the
> latest release (20040311) as base.
>
> Please tell me what you think of it.

Could you send me a patch against cvs with changes to all the files you
modified? The last patch you sent wasn't compete and it is problematic
and error prone for me to try to piece your two submissions together.

Thanks.

---
Ted Roth
PGP Key ID: 0x18F846E9
Jabber ID: address@hidden