[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Stack size
From: |
James_Dean |
Subject: |
RE: Stack size |
Date: |
Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:23:51 -0400 |
Hi,
I am a little puzzled. Are you passing the filename to consult in on the
command line?
I have not figured out how to do this. What is the syntax?
I thought there must be a way but could not figure it out. I have been
starting gprolog
and *then* consulting.
Which are you doing?
I don't have much experience with the gprolog system, but 100M of swap
space seems
pretty small for the values you're setting.
- Jim
zet <address@hidden>@gnu.org on 04/18/2001 11:07:41 AM
Sent by: address@hidden
To: <address@hidden>
cc: (bcc: James Dean/CAM/Lotus)
Subject: RE: Stack size
Sorry, I'm really forgot to include all this info.
> Which GNU Prolog version?
Current stable - 1.2.1
> Which operating system?
RedHat 7.0
> If, what are the error messages?
Actually, there are no error messages. After some experiments, I've
found, that setting stacks sizes greater than 120M in sum crashes prolog.
Core dump.
> How large is the amount of available memory on your mainboard?
I think this doesnt matter, because dumping the core is the worst thing
that can happens. But I've 320M of physical memory and 100M of swap
space.
> How large have you set the other *SZes?
GLOBALSZ=200M and other was not modified.
> You're sure you have no infinite recursion in the source?
Well, this also doesnt matter, because gprolog doesnt start at all - it
just dumps the core.
> Please tell something about your source.
Source contains a description of 16-bit multplier circuit. 260K, 3600
lines. It just doesnt consult this files with small STACKs, so I've tried
to increase it. Unsuccessfully.
> There is a builtin debugger. Do you stepped through your programm
> by setting spy points?
No comments :)
Thanks for attention.
_______________________________________________
Users-prolog mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/users-prolog
- Stack size, zet, 2001/04/13
- RE: Stack size,
James_Dean <=