Re: Re: Newbie trouble with ebg from the CMU AI archive

[designrw]

Thanks, Lindsey. 

Feeling flush with (a cheap) victory, I move ahead: Excelsior! 

Roy
> 
> From: address@hidden
> Date: 2002/07/30 Tue AM 08:36:06 CDT
> To: <address@hidden>
> CC: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: Newbie trouble with ebg from the CMU AI archive
> 
> 
> On Sunday, July 28, 2002, at 02:58  PM, <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > I'm a newbie. I assume that the problem getting ebg.pl to process 
> > eb_1.pl (attached: both are said to be in Edinburgh syntax) is due to a 
> > difference between gnuprolog and Edinburgh prolog but I don't know 
> > enough (still waiting to get Clocksin and Mellish from BN) to resolve 
> > it. I know by looking at the gnuprolog manual the syntax of the error 
> > msg that's generated, but not enough to move foward. At this point, all 
> > I want to do is simple to get ebg.pl to correctly process ebg_1.pl. Any 
> > help would be appreciated.
> 
> For gprolog: assert/1 and not/1 are not defined in gprolog--use 
> asserta/1 and '\+'/1 instead.
> For clause(foo(X, Y), Z) to work, foo/2 must be "public"; so add lines 
> of the form ":-public(foo/2)." to the beginning of ebg_1.pl.
> I've attached my modified versions of these programs.
> 
> Cheers,
> -lindsey
> 
> 
>