[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations?
From: |
Erick Alphonse |
Subject: |
consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations? |
Date: |
Sun, 20 Oct 2002 15:21:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.1) Gecko/20020826 |
Hello,
I need to read a user-supplied file, where he defines all the settings
needed to run some experiments. These settings are provided as facts and
I would like the user to be able to modify them later. So I define them
as dynamic before loading the user's file. But consult declares them as
static, overriding the dynamic declaration. Is it the intended
behaviour? Eclipse and swi-prolog don't do that.
Here an example:
GNU Prolog 1.2.14
By Daniel Diaz
Copyright (C) 1999-2002 Daniel Diaz
| ?- [user].
compiling user for byte code...
:- dynamic(a/0).
user compiled, 2 lines read - 166 bytes written, 10276 ms
yes
| ?- predicate_property(a/0,P).
P = dynamic ?
yes
| ?- consult(bk). % contains just the fact a.
compiling /home/alphonse/tmp/bk.pl for byte code...
/home/alphonse/tmp/bk.pl compiled, 1 lines read - 236 bytes written, 26 ms
warning: /home/alphonse/tmp/bk.pl:1: redefining procedure a/0
user:1: previous definition
yes
| ?- a.
yes
| ?- predicate_property(a/0,P).
P = static ?
yes
| ?-
Thanks for claryfing that to me,
Regards,
Erick.
- Segfault in Mk_Proper_List, Olivier Teulière, 2002/10/19
- Re: Segfault in Mk_Proper_List, Erick Alphonse, 2002/10/20
- consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations?,
Erick Alphonse <=
- Re: consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations?, Lindsey Spratt, 2002/10/20
- Re: consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations?, Erick Alphonse, 2002/10/25
- Settings etc. (Re: consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations?), Timo Karjalainen, 2002/10/26
- Re: Settings etc. (Re: consult/1 overrides dynamic predicate declarations?), Erick Alphonse, 2002/10/28
- disabling C flags machine : -mcpu=pentiumpro on i686, Erick Alphonse, 2002/10/28