[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Atom table full
From: |
Vic Bancroft |
Subject: |
Re: Atom table full |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Apr 2008 20:33:25 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (X11/20080226) |
JCK wrote:
I'm getting an "Atom table full" error. Admittedly, I do not know
much about the atom table, I didn't even know there was one until I
found out mine was full. I read a post in the archives concerning
this which stated that: it was planned in the future to have an atom
table without limitations (which I don't think has been done since I'm
getting this message); and the only way to change the limit was to
modify the code and recompile.
Are you running on a 32 bit operating system ?
What version of mysql are you using ?
The thing is I'm quite sure I don't need that many atoms, the portion
of my code that seems to be the culprit is a loop which reads in data
(from mysql), processes the data and writes data back (to mysql). I
was running into problems with stack size, so instead of looping
recursively, I used a 'repeat' which seemed to have improved my stack
issues but then I got "Atom Table Full'. I think it's just looping so
many times that any number of atoms that get created and not destroyed
will eventually fill the table. I even exit the 'repeat' loop every X
number of loops (in hopes of cleaning thing up), and then re-enter the
'repeat' loop.
That sounds like an appropriate way to deal with a database, though
there seems to be some dangling reference. Can you post your code or a
test case that replicates the problem ?
I have no need for backtracking during this portion of the code and
have no need for the data after a loop is completed (it's in mysql).
So I guess my question is:
(1) is there anyway of clearing the atoms that won't be used again
from table?
(2) there's nowhere in the loop where a huge number of atoms are
created. The only place I can think of there being atoms created is
after SQL calls when I'm converting and putting the data into prolog
variables. Is there anyone else who's had this problem found a
culprit which is known for creating lots of atoms?
(3) Any suggestions are welcome.
I have not used mysql from gprolog for a while, but am interested in
it's proper operation.
My system is a linux x86_64 platform, running GNU Prolog 1.3.0 and
mysql-5.0.27, so perhaps we can see if the situation can replicated here
. . .
more,
l8r,
v
--
"The future is here. It's just not evenly distributed yet."
-- William Gibson, quoted by Whitfield Diffie