Re: Support of older Emacs versions

[Mark Diekhans]

John Stoffel <john@stoffel.org> writes:
> Sure, that addresses that issue for those who aren't interested in
> getting VM moving again as a project.

Done: viewmail-dev

Not everyone can be a developer; don't want people to
unsubscribe because of mail overwhelm. Having so users to test
is good.

> Maybe?  I just don't want us to leave too many people in the dust, me
> included.  I also don't get the impression that emacs is changing
> _that_ fast either.  But I could be very very wrong.

Features get add, but they are very good about not breaking
compatibility.  Deprecation period is long.

Pick a minimum version that seems reasonable based on imperfect
data and go with it as a test base.  If there are issues, we can
talk about it and make a decision.