Re: [vile] Error finding

[Paul van Tilburg]

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:33:14AM -0400, Paul Fox wrote:
> paul van tilburg wrote:
>  > On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 08:28:08AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>  > > It sounds essentially as if you need a macro that loads the file and sets
>  > > the error-buffer to it.  Here's a quick try at it - seems to work:
>  > >
>  > > store-procedure layers
>  > >         ~local %cbufname
>  > >         setv %cbufname $cbufname
>  > >         ~quiet edit-file 'foo.err'
>  > >         error-buffer 'foo.err'
>  > >         buffer %cbufname
>  > > ~endm
>  > 
>  > Ok, that works, thanks. It is a start though, because there are a few 
> issues.
>  > If the filename is longer than 20 (?) chars, the buffername will not
>  > match the filename anymore.
>  > Also, when I save, the LaTeX file is recompiled, the .err file is
>  > replaced but vile doesn't notice that.  I can switch to it, answer yes
>  > to the reload?  question, switch back and then use ^X-^X again.  Is
>  > there any way to automate this in the sense that..  where should I hook 
>  > that up?
> 
> i sort of missed the beginning of this thread -- i guess the
> compilation step isn't being done as a result of a command you
> run explicitly?  [...]

Indeed, it is not.  It is compiled when the main file or any of its includes
is change (i.e. saved in vile).   So maybe I need to make a 
of a macro simulating the behaviour of ^X-^X that also "reloads" the
Error Buffer.

Paul

-- 
PhD Student @ Eindhoven                     | email: address@hidden
University of Technology, The Netherlands   | JID: address@hidden
>>> Using the Power of Debian GNU/Linux <<< | GnuPG key ID: 0x50064181