[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] vile-9.8h
From: |
Chris Green |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] vile-9.8h |
Date: |
Mon, 13 Aug 2012 11:09:39 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 05:37:21AM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
>
> > In my terminal (not xterm) windows I get to use fonts like "DejaVu Sans
> > Mono" which are much, much easier on the eye than the Lucida Sans and
> > such available in xvile. Basically I think my terminal allows me to use
> > truetype fonts whereas xvile doesn't. I think xterm has the same
> > limitations as xvile.
>
> sure - neither does fontsets (splicing together fonts at runtime).
>
Yes, of course, that was the 'selling point' of trutype fonts originally
wasn't it? You only needed to distrubute/install one file for a font
rather than the 'old' way of a file per font size. Inevitably that
means that the application has to do more work by sizing the font
itself.
--
Chris Green
Re: [vile] vile-9.8h, Brendan O'Dea, 2012/08/23