Re: [vile] [PATCH] vileperl.rc (Was: Re: Odd vileserv error)

[Chris Green]

On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 07:24:27PM -0400, Thomas Dickey wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> | From: "Brendan O'Dea" <address@hidden>
> | To: "J. Chris Coppick" <address@hidden>
> | Cc: "Vile mailing list" <address@hidden>
> | Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 7:12:55 PM
> | Subject: [vile] [PATCH] vileperl.rc (Was: Re:  Odd vileserv error)
> | 
> | On 18 April 2015 at 08:25, J. Chris Coppick
> | <address@hidden> wrote:
> | > In theory, Vileserv will detect if it's already running and do the
> | > right
> | > thing so you MIGHT be able to do without the '~if &not &rd
> | > "$HOME/.vilesock"'...
> | 
> | Indeed, it does do exactly the right thing.  Maybe that guy *did*
> | know
> | what he was on about...
> | 
> | So the test in the example rc file should probably be removed, as it
> | will prevent Vileserv from recovering when there is an orphaned
> | socket.  The two subsequent require lines are also superfluous to
> | requirements.
> | 
> | Tom: suggested patch to the example attached.
> 
> duly noted (thanks)
> 
... and thanks from me too, to everyone.

-- 
Chris Green