[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses)
From: |
Thomas Dickey |
Subject: |
Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses) |
Date: |
Fri, 16 Sep 2016 17:27:21 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:48:46PM -0400, Wayne Cuddy wrote:
> When vile is linked against ncursesw, version 5.9 64-bit in this case, it
> chews up the CPU when highlighting is enabled.
In a quick check with my Debian7, I don't see a problem.
(I used the CHANGES file as something to highlight).
> I don't need to link with ncursesw it's just something that I figured
> should work since it's noted to be compatible.
>
> Let me know if there's any other information I can provide.
well...
a) which system are you running on (so I can check the package)?
b) what's your .vilerc look like?
c) can you reproduce this with a small text file?
--
Thomas E. Dickey <address@hidden>
http://invisible-island.net
ftp://invisible-island.net
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
- [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses), Wayne Cuddy, 2016/09/16
- Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses),
Thomas Dickey <=
- Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses), Thomas Dickey, 2016/09/18
- Re: [vile] load of 1 and 100% CPU (ncursesw vs ncurses), Wayne Cuddy, 2016/09/21
- [vile] print-prefixed-lines-til, Wayne Cuddy, 2016/09/27
- Re: [vile] print-prefixed-lines-til, Wayne Cuddy, 2016/09/27
- Re: [vile] print-prefixed-lines-til, Thomas Dickey, 2016/09/27
- Re: [vile] print-prefixed-lines-til, Wayne Cuddy, 2016/09/27
- Re: [vile] print-prefixed-lines-til, Thomas Dickey, 2016/09/27
- Re: [vile] print-prefixed-lines-til, Wayne Cuddy, 2016/09/28