[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Start again with syntax highlighting problem
From: |
Gary Jennejohn |
Subject: |
Re: Start again with syntax highlighting problem |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Jan 2023 21:02:03 +0100 |
On Mon, 2 Jan 2023 14:17:43 -0500
Thomas Dickey <dickey@his.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 02, 2023 at 10:45:14AM +0000, Chris Green wrote:
> > OK, restart, I think I now see a pattern in this. I completely
> > removed and re-installed vile from the Ubuntu repositories on esprimo
> > and it is now working correctly there. I had modified it there
> > because of the issue a while ago with UTF8 characters. So the table
> > is now as follows:-
> >
> > backup xubuntu 22.10 vile 9.8w colour OK, but not right
> > bison Android 11 vile 9.8w colour OK, but not right
> > caracal Debian 10 vile 9.8 no colour syntax
> > cheddar Debian 10 vile 9.8t colour OK
> > esprimo xubuntu 22.04 vile 9.8v colour OK
> > isbd Ubuntu 20.04 vile 9.8t colour OK
> > odin Debian 9 vile 9.8s colour OK
> > pimedia Debian 11 vile 9.8u colour OK
> > t470 xubuntu 22.10 vile 9.8w colour OK, but not right
> > tsohost very old vile 9.8 no colour syntax
> >
> >
> > This makes *much* more sense! :-) The systems with versions older
> > than vile9.8w do syntax highlighting OK. The two systems where I
> > built vile myself and installed as a user (no root access) don't do
> > syntax highlighting but thati's almost certainly something I have
> > missed out in the build and it's not so important there anyway.
> >
> > So, the question is why the syntax highlighting of vilemode for
> > version 9.8w is messed up. It's not badly wrong, it gets the colour
>
> I made an incorrect bug-fix in 9.8w for vilemode, which is fixed in 9.8x
>
> This was the change (reverting it will fix the bug):
>
> @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
>
> #define FLTSTACK_EXTRA int with_state; int with_active;
> #define FltStack_WITH_STATE FLTSTACK_THIS.with_state
> -#define FltStack_WITH_ACTIVE FLTSTACK_THIS.with_state
> +#define FltStack_WITH_ACTIVE FLTSTACK_THIS.with_active
> #include <fltstack.h>
>
> #if defined(_estruct_h) && !SMALLER
>
This is peculiar. In my 9.8w code (FreeBSD) this error is not present.
> > of comments right throughout but gets confused about keyword colours
> > and within some 'map' settings. As far as I can see on other file
> > types (shell scripts, python, C) version 9.8w gets the highlighting
> > correct so it does look like just an error in the vilemode
> > highlighting.
> >
> > Has the vile-filt-filt file changed between 9.8v and 9.8w?
> >
> > --
> > Chris Green
> >
>
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey <dickey@invisible-island.net>
> https://invisible-island.net
--
Gary Jennejohn