[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Minor things
From: |
Moritz Schulte |
Subject: |
Re: Minor things |
Date: |
Tue, 01 Jan 2002 23:44:45 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/21.1 |
Marcus Brinkmann <address@hidden> writes:
> The operating system is called GNU. [...]
Yes, I know that. But I guess that it's more confusing for people who
want to find out what the Hurd is if they read one that page that the
Hurd is a "kernel" and on another page that "the Hurd" means "the
servers running on a kernel"...
> Maybe core is a better word? Everything I can think of is
> overloaded in some way.
The Hurd, an operating system core. You know, I'm not a native
speaker, but that seems better to me than "kernel". But I also don't
want to be a nitpicker..
> The only problem is that a microkernel is missing that supports SMP.
> Do you think that we should flip-flop the wording, depending on what
> microkernels are available at the time?
Yes, the sentences as it is there is simply wrong, IMHO. The topic is
"advantages of the Hurd" and one point is "the Hurd _runs_ effeciently
on SMP". Either the topic should be "goals of the Hurd" or the point
it should be "_could_ run".
> BTW, diff works also very well for text ;)
Yes, next time.
moritz
--
address@hidden - http://duesseldorf.ccc.de/~moritz/
GPG fingerprint = 3A14 3923 15BE FD57 FC06 B501 0841 2D7B 6F98 4199
- Re: Minor things, Marcus Brinkmann, 2002/01/01
- Re: Minor things,
Moritz Schulte <=