Re: [XForms] xforms on epel - no doc rpm

[Jens Thoms Toerring]

Hi David,

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 02:24:06PM -0400, address@hidden wrote:
> For what it is worth, one could include the demos as a separate sub 
> package (for example -demos, or -samples) and would be very useful to 
> include.  Let me know if you need help with a spec file update - I may be 
> able to cobble together an example.

As the demo programs are often refered to in the documentation
I'd consider it preferable to keep them as part of it - I fear
I caused some unnecessary confusion when I wrote that they
aren't the documentation. What I wanted to express was that
they are only a part of it.

                        Best regards, Jens 
-- 
  \   Jens Thoms Toerring  ________      address@hidden
   \_______________________________      http://toerring.de