Re: [Adonthell-general] SRPMS for Adonthell and Waste's Edge

[Mathieu Bridon]

Hi

In fact, I managed to pass the python check by giving to the configure script the right parameter (can't tell right now, I'm not on my computer). Don't know if that's better than what you suggest.

However, I can't build adonthell anymore on Fedora 9. I'm having lots of errors during the "make", and I have no clue how to solve them :(

I spent quite some time on that and couldn't find anything, so I was about to ask you :)

I also tried to build CVS, but it simply says that a file is missing (Makfile.ac IIRC).

Mathieu

2008/5/27 Kai Sterker <address@hidden>:

On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 8:56 PM, Kai Sterker <address@hidden> wrote:

I had a bit of time at work and checked the state of the Fedora package:

>> adonthell: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=441411

Since the Python stuff is really a bit of a pain, I went and did a
more exhaustive search that led me to

 http://autoconf-archive.cryp.to/macros-by-category.html#PYTHON

Of special interest is the AC_PYTHON_DEVEL macro, which appears to be
doing what we want, but in a much nicer way using Python build-in
distutils.

Actually, it might not be the best solution either, as people seem to
have problems with it too:

 http://groups.google.com/group/comp.lang.python/browse_thread/thread/845ef2c35e60ddd6/ae27ada2e5b1188f?lnk=gst&q=path+to+python+library#ae27ada2e5b1188f

I'll possibly play around with it a little bit later this week to see
if it would work on OS X, for example. Doesn't look like it supports
frameworks, though. It might work however, to just reuse the part
where they locate the python library and linker flags.

Maybe you could try that as a patch to configure.in, which means I
could keep working on other stuff. If it works, I'd apply the patch so
it would be in 0.3.5.

Kai


_______________________________________________
Adonthell-general mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/adonthell-general