[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze
From: |
Davide G. M. Salvetti |
Subject: |
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Oct 2006 19:55:39 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
>>>>> DK == David Kastrup [2006-10-2]
This discussion in itself has some interest; however it risks being, as
it is customary with this particular topic, too much heated. I would
like to comment, but unfortunately at this moment I am not in a position
to discuss with a pace as fast as you do; therefore I will just refrain
myself from commenting, but for what follows.
DK> Anyway, I just got back the reply from Richard Stallman, and we can
DK> leave off the front and back cover texts and invariant sections (the
DK> license text itself will be excluded from being covered by the GFDL
DK> since it obviously is not subject to modification).
This is very good news, and shows that RMS can listen to practical
problems, if they have no political downside (not that I would doubt of
it).
[...]
DK> No part of AUCTeX will end up in Debian non-free without Davide
DK> having to bend Debian rules even slightly. This is a better
DK> situation than that of Emacs itself, and I am grateful to be able to
DK> save users and developers the respective hassles.
I would like to make it clear that I do not see the need to fork
anything, manual included. I'm happy with how AUCTeX is being developed
and with how David is doing as the AUCTeX maintainer. I support AUCTeX
being a GNU project. I shall not follow any fork: Debian will continue
to include upstream AUCTeX, at least for what depends on me and with the
current situation.
--
Thanks, Davide
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Frank Küster, 2006/10/01
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/01
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Reiner Steib, 2006/10/01
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Frank Küster, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Frank Küster, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Frank Küster, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze,
Davide G. M. Salvetti <=
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/02
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Ralf Angeli, 2006/10/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Ralf Angeli, 2006/10/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Ralf Angeli, 2006/10/03
- Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, David Kastrup, 2006/10/03
- [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Ralf Angeli, 2006/10/03
Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Frank Küster, 2006/10/03
[AUCTeX-devel] Re: New auctex version coming, and the freeze, Reiner Steib, 2006/10/01