Re: [AUCTeX] First try at the Biber support merge

[Ken Brown]

On 7/25/2012 3:23 PM, Tassilo Horn wrote:
> Ken Brown<address@hidden>  writes:
>
> > > Looking at the patch, the only function in that procedure that was
> > > touched is `TeX-command-query', but to me it looks unlikely to be the
> > > cause.
> >
> > I agree that the changes to TeX-command-query look harmless.  But
> > TeX-command-query calls TeX-check-files, and Philip made quite a few
> > changes to the latter.  Could the problem be in that function?
>
> I don't think so.  It seems to be used only to figure out the next TeX
> command that would make sense.  If the user selects View explicitly,
> that shouldn't have an effect.

OK.

BTW, it seems surprising that Philip rewrote TeX-check-files, unless he 
thought there was a bug in it.  I don't see anything specific to Biber 
or BibTeX either in the original version or in his rewrite.  (That 
explains why you didn't include it in your version of the biber-merge 
patch.)

Philip, am I missing something?

Ken