[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows
From: |
Arash Esbati |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows |
Date: |
Sun, 08 Jan 2017 19:13:15 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.91 |
Hi Mosè,
Mosè Giordano <address@hidden> writes:
> If no one has objections, I will *not* distribute a Windows package
> for AUCTeX 11.90.
+1.
> My idea is also to make it clearer on the website that the preferred
> way to install AUCTeX is through GNU ELPA, independently from the
> operating system used. What do you think?
Actually, I think that this decision is overdue. I suggest that we also
emphasize more in the official documentation that ELPA is the preferred
way to go. WDYT?
Best, Arash
- [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/07
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, gojjoe, 2017/01/07
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows,
Arash Esbati <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10