[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows
From: |
Mosè Giordano |
Subject: |
Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Jan 2017 19:19:08 +0100 |
Hi Arash,
2017-01-08 19:13 GMT+01:00 Arash Esbati <address@hidden>:
> I suggest that we also
> emphasize more in the official documentation that ELPA is the preferred
> way to go. WDYT?
The installation section of the manual starts with
The simplest way of installing AUCTeX is by using the Emacs package manager
integrated in Emacs 24 and greater (ELPA).
and the description of the process takes more or less one other line.
It looks pretty clear to me, but this isn't probably sufficient, since
sometimes I see people in trouble trying to compile the package from
source. If you have ideas on how to improve it, please go ahead.
Bye,
Mosè
- [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/07
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, gojjoe, 2017/01/07
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows,
Mosè Giordano <=
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/08
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/09
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Mosè Giordano, 2017/01/10
- Re: [AUCTeX] [RFC] Do not distribute a package for Windows, Arash Esbati, 2017/01/10