[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT
From: |
Noah Misch |
Subject: |
Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Aug 2005 14:22:00 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 11:52:16AM +0200, Stepan Kasal wrote:
> But yes, your idea is good: we can check that the variable has the
> required form, and then remove the case statement.
This looks fine.
> Attached please find a patch which implements this. Moreover, it moves
> more common code to _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT.
Please omit the common code elimination. The `m4_if's of the new code mostly
cancel the benefits of unification.
- A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/16
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Noah Misch, 2005/08/16
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/17
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT,
Noah Misch <=
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/18
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/18
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/19
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/19
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/22
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/22
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/23
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/23
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/24
- AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/24