[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT
From: |
Stepan Kasal |
Subject: |
Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:01:28 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
Hello,
On Tue, Aug 23, 2005 at 10:20:57AM -0700, Paul Eggert wrote:
> set x $ac_cv_$1
> shift
I wanted to avoid this workaround. I thought it might be nicer to
reject all eveil values first, and then have some nice code to handle
nice values. But it doesn't matter.
What about the following patch?
Stepan
autoconf-20050824-canonical-split.patch
Description: Text document
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, (continued)
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/17
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Noah Misch, 2005/08/17
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/18
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/18
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/19
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/19
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/22
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/22
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/23
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/23
- Re: A simplification of _AC_CANONICAL_SPLIT,
Stepan Kasal <=
- AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/24
- Re: AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Stepan Kasal, 2005/08/25
- Re: AS_SET_UNEXPANDED_ARGS proposal, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/25