[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule)
From: |
Earnie Boyd |
Subject: |
Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule) |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2001 17:15:53 -0400 |
Paul Eggert wrote:
>
> > From: Mike Castle <address@hidden>
> > Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2001 12:40:50 -0700
> >
> > Does that mean that autoconf should limit itself to
> > the POSIX portable file name character set?
>
> Of course. If Autoconf uses non-POSIX file names (other than as part
> of a test for file name portability, or after such a test succeeds),
> then that is a portability bug that should get fixed.
And when I was getting to like Autoconf. Now I'll have to fork it to
get my needs for portability met. Way to go, Paul. ;^D
Earnie.
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
- Re: Ebcdic rule, (continued)
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Russ Allbery, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/02
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Eric Siegerman, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Harlan Stenn, 2001/10/03
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Ebcdic rule, Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Mike Castle, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule),
Earnie Boyd <=
- Re: Autoconf, DOS and NT (was Ebcdic rule), Paul Eggert, 2001/10/04