[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Adding an external project to autoconf
From: |
Keith Marshall |
Subject: |
Re: Adding an external project to autoconf |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Sep 2009 20:56:50 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.10 |
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 18:12:02 Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> And yes, it is perfectly possible to have subpackages that do not
> use Automake, or do not use Autoconf either. Their configure
> scripts merely have to conform to what the GNU Coding Standards
> say, and their makefiles too.
Which is probably unfortunate, from the OP's perspective, because...
On Wednesday 09 September 2009 16:02:58 Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> the zlib project does not use Autoconf or Automake. It
> only pretends to look like a project which uses Autoconf or
> Automake using a hand-written configure and Makefile.in which only
> works completely under Linux.
...and the resemblance is in name only; beyond that, there isn't even
a superficial likeness -- certainly in no way GCS conformant.
--
Regards,
Keith.
- Adding an external project to autoconf, Dan Smithers, 2009/09/09
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2009/09/09
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Marshall B. Rogers, 2009/09/09
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/09
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf,
Keith Marshall <=
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Dan Smithers, 2009/09/11
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/11
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Dan Smithers, 2009/09/14
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Eric Blake, 2009/09/14
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/14
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Steffen Dettmer, 2009/09/14
- Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Steffen Dettmer, 2009/09/14
Re: Adding an external project to autoconf, Steffen Dettmer, 2009/09/14